
Steven Menashi
Steven Menashi was an Olin/Searle Fellow at Georgetown
University Law Center for 2009-10. Previously, he was associate editor of Policy
Review, a public affairs fellow at the Hoover Institution, and an editorial
writer for The New York Sun. He has published articles in The New York Times, National
Review, Notre Dame Law Review, and other publications.
He attended Stanford Law School, where he was elected to Order
of the Coif; served as senior articles editor of the Stanford Law Review,
managing editor of the Stanford Law & Policy Review, and
president of the Federalist Society; and won the Kirkwood Moot Court
Competition, the Carl Mason Franklin Award in International Law, and the Steven
M. Block Civil Liberties Award. He then served as a law clerk to Judge Douglas H.
Ginsburg of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit. He was also a David
and Lucille Packard Fellow at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced
International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, and
graduated from Dartmouth College, where he
edited The Dartmouth Review. He is a member of the New York Bar.
Selected Publications:
Toward
a "More Enlightened and Tolerant View"
66 NYU Annual Survey of American Law 31
(2010)
When religious schools participate in publicly
funded school choice programs, states may want to impose regulations
that promote majoritarian norms. Yet such regulation may compromise the institutions' religious missions
and therefore raises constitutional concerns.
Religion of Doubt
Commentary, June 2010
"It
is not the task of a liberal democratic state to provide answers to the
deeper questions about life, let alone impose metaphysical beliefs on
its citizens." Well,
yes — and no.
Nondelegation
and the Unitary Executive
12 University of Pennsylvania Journal of
Constitutional Law 251 (2010) (with Douglas H. Ginsburg)
Americans have always mistrusted executive power, but
only recently has "the unitary executive" emerged as the
bogeyman of American politics. Yet the unitary executive has
fallen into ill repute and apparent obsolescence not because of an
executive bent upon autocracy but because of a legislature freed from
the constraints of the separation of powers.
Jews
and Money
Commentary, February 2010
Among Jews, economic success has been a source of both
pride and embarrassment. Among their neighbors, it has prompted both
affection and abhorrence. Either way, the fate of
the Jews has long been tied to the fate of capitalism.
All
the President's Czars
The Weekly Standard, October 12, 2009
By
establishing policy czars accountable only to himself, President Obama has sought
to unify executive policymaking and guard against bureaucratic and
congressional usurpation. For all
the hullabaloo surrounding the "unitary
executive theory," Barack Obama has emerged as
the leading champion of the unitary executive.
The
Undead Constitution
Policy Review, October-November 2009
Living
constitutionalists aim to establish not a "living" but a
zombie Constitution; they want to take the corpse of constitutional text
and reanimate it with new principles in every generation. But this
Constitution is at war with itself. Like Frankenstein’s monster, half
dead and half alive, it wanders in the wilderness never finding complete
acceptance.
Political
Lexicographer: William Safire's Voice
Forbes.com, September 27, 2009
Of
all the pundits, thumbsuckers, spinmeisters, talking heads and the
panjandrums of the opinion mafia who formed the chattering classes,
Safire focused most intently on the words and catch phrases that
governed American political life. "With words we govern men,"
Safire quoted Benjamin Disraeli as saying.
Irving Kristol, The Moral Critic
Forbes.com, September 19, 2009
Among
the popular myths surrounding neoconservatism is the notion that its
intellectual father was a "former communist" who turned
rightward in penance for his radical past. The
view of politics espoused by a twenty-four-year-old Irving Kristol
remains as good a definition as any of the political persuasion that
would drive his career.
Article III as a Constitutional
Compromise
84 Notre Dame Law Review 1135 (2009)
Legislative compromise pervaded the whole
constitutional design, whether it took the form of precisely worded provisions
that enact particular policies or imprecisely worded provisions that invoke
abstract political principles. The ratification of Article III contained just
such a compromise over abstract principles of state sovereign immunity.
The
Metaphor Analyst
The New York Sun,
December 28, 2004
George
Lakoff's
ideas may be informing the progressive movement at the moment, but they
are surprisingly illiberal. His book often reads like a
counter-Enlightenment tract of the Romantic period.
Conflicts Religious and Secular
Policy Review,
August-September 2004
From the beginning, Zionism and Arabism
shared the same intellectual patrimony and spoke the same language. But
neither movement, just as
each was trying to dignify a dormant nation, could bear an injury to its
nationalist aspirations.
Agitprop
The New York Sun,
July 22, 2004
Galleries
from Chelsea to Madison Avenue are stuffed with anti-Bush exhibits. As
long as we're being such sticklers about the law, perhaps we should call
this artwork what it really is: political advertising.
The Politics of the WHO
The New Atlantis,
Fall 2003
The World Health Organization’s usefulness lies precisely
in its ability to bring scientific evidence to bear in political disputes
that often lose sight of facts on the ground. The group’s recent
history, however, reveals a bureaucracy increasingly unhinged from the
real world.
The Word is Nigh
Claremont Review of Books,
Fall 2003
The prophets did not address themselves to some
otherworldly mystical reality. For them, the moral law was a living
presence here on earth, entrusted to human stewardship.
Focus on Evil
National Review,
September 1, 2003
Perversely, mass murderers often become figures of fun.
Living at a safe distance, we can afford a macabre laugh or two. As it turns out,
we experience evil not so
much as banality but as kitsch.
Freedom of Expression 101
Hoover Weekly Essays,
March 3, 2003
Many intellectuals invoke "academic freedom" not
to protect the ideal of disinterested inquiry but to shield their own
ideological agendas from public scrutiny. When professors attack their
critics as McCarthyites, it is they who are trying to silence dissent
through intimidation.
Humans, Animals, and the Human Animal
Policy Review,
February-March 2003
It’s the modern left that believes people stand outside and above
nature, peering down on the rest of creation with a godlike power to manipulate it for our own purposes.
Conservatives have counterpoised
a belief in the permanent truths of human nature to the liberal faith in the
perfectibility of man. The idea of human malleability is nowhere more vividly
refuted than in descriptions of kinship between man and animal.
Defining 'Culture'
The Washington Times,
December 15, 2002
What we're defending, it turns out, are not the various
customs of our culture, unmediated by reference to objective standards of
civilization, undirected toward any purpose. What's at risk is
civilization, a universal system of standards that can act as a guide for
all human societies.
Comfort's Cost
The Washington Times,
September 1, 2002
The most distinctively human impulses — the artistic or
philosophic impulse — begin in awe and apprehension at the vast
incomprehensibility of the world. Today, however, the anxious wonder that
is the root of human excellence can be cured with a generous dose of
Prozac.
The Church-State Tangle
Policy Review,
August-September
2002
In recent history, courts have worked to
push religion out of public life. So it’s understandable
that many now fear that publicly funded school choice will
undermine schools’ religious missions. But such an
attitude fails to appreciate the emerging change in the
court’s understanding of the First Amendment.
The Empty Decade
Doublethink,
Summer 2002
The
1990s were anomalous in that the United States had no
enemy—indeed, the 1990s were shaped by the belief that
all fundamental conflicts had ended. In the relatively
peaceful and demobilized 1990s, Americans could easily
evade troublesome moral judgments and retreat into
comfortable, private universes. Clinton-era politics was
about private comforts rather than broad national
interests.
Teaching Evil
Policy Review,
April-May 2002
If our politics rests fundamentally on
self-interest, then how can one expect the heroic
selflessness Kaplan admires in Churchill and others? If
the ultimate goal is self-preservation, why should anyone
risk his life? The “heroic outlook” Kaplan attributes
to the Greeks was possible precisely because they
recognized a purpose higher than themselves.
Charmed by Tyranny
Policy Review,
February-March
2002
We may understand why intellectuals
living under tyranny, jaded by the degradations of war and
intimidated by a totalitarian state, would submit to
regnant orthodoxy. But what accounts for tyranny’s
apologists in free societies?
Yasser
Arafat, Zionist
National Review Online,
November 8, 2001
The Palestinians, imitating Zionism, have also concerned
themselves with establishing historical rights to the land
of Israel, and erasing Jewish history there.
Double Dorm Standards
The American Enterprise,
October-November 2000
The military says its “Don’t
ask, don’t tell” policy promotes the unit cohesion
needed in combat by reducing sexual tension and respecting
personal privacy. University administrators insist troops
in mortal combat should be able to handle the tension of
living in mixed quarters. But it turns out that college
kids living in dorms and frat houses, threatened by such
dangers as beer kegs and basketball games, are quite a
different matter.
Hide That College Fund!
The New York Times,
November 21, 1998
The Government's need-based financial aid system
acts as a tax on the wealth that a family accumulates
before and during the time that a family's child attends
college. The system punishes families for wise economic
planning, and discourages saving.
|