America In, France and Germany Down
Steven Menashi ::
2/20/2003

President Chirac thinks Central and Eastern European countries missed “an opportunity to shut up” when they announced their support for the American and British line on disarming Iraq. “New Europe” isn’t very happy about that. But it turns out that Eastern Europeans don’t require French counsel to recognize a good opportunity to keep quiet. As the Jerusalem Post observes today, “While millions of Western Europeans demonstrated against uprooting the genocidal regime of Saddam Hussein, the streets of Eastern Europe's capitals were resoundingly silent” last weekend.

It’s true that anti-American sentiment in Western Europe has been overstated, and exaggerated by obdurate political leadership, but there’s no mistaking the support the United States enjoys in the east. The Eastern European nations have a recent experience of struggle -- they were our front-line allies in the fight against Soviet totalitarianism -- and they’re more likely to appreciate the role of American power in winning and preserving their freedom. For “New Europe,” the world is a dangerous place of power politics, not the cooperative neighborhood of agreements and contracts that Western Europe has built in the EU. Interestingly, this means that Israel -- a child of Western European thought -- finds more sympathy from these other small countries “suffering from a difficult geography,” as the Post notes, than it does from its parent nations.

It also means that the Eastern Europeans are the advocates of American involvement in Europe. All of which commends the American policy of expanding NATO to include the Baltic States. The NATO alliance was originally formed, as the saying went, to keep “America in, Germany down, and Russia out.” Russia is no longer our enemy, of course. Yet as the transatlantic rift with “Old Europe” widens, NATO still has much the same mission: to keep America in Europe, and to keep France and Germany down.

Former French foreign minister Hubert Vedrine has said that French diplomacy aims to create a multipolar world by constraining the U.S. through multilateral institutions such as the United Nations and the IMF. NATO serves a parallel function for the United States: ensuring an American role in Europe, constraining European anti-Americanism. Chirac’s chastisement of Eastern Europe -- that Europe must have a united foreign policy and speak with one voice -- applies equally to France. With so many European countries supportive of the U.S., France cannot define the European position in opposition to the U.S. Europe’s united voice does not speak French or German, but a wide range of European languages. Yet for these countries to constrain the excesses of French and German hubris, they must be part of Europe's institutional voice in the European Union and NATO. They must “join Europe,” as Chirac put it.

Those who think NATO has outlived its usefulness are flat wrong, and the divergence of Old Europe and New Europe is Exhibit A.